Is the frame on this work original?
Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen answered
Dear Alexandra, Our registrar of Modern Art, Jacqueline Rapmund, let me know that in the book 'Impressionisme: een schone kijk' (Cat. BVB 1992) it is mentioned that director P. Haverkoren van Rijsewijk wrote to Jo Van Gogh-Bonger on April 3, 1903, to confirm the arrival of the painting. He writes that the work went straight on to the restorer and a dark mahogany frame was ordered. So the frame is not original by Van Gogh.
This Van Gogh painting was the first of the artist's paintings to enter a public collection in 1903. He entitled it 'Symphony in yellow'. It marks the transition from his dark Dutch oeuvre to his lighter expressionistic French work. He took it with him to Paris, where he added the lighter dabs.
Van Gogh attached a small drawing of this painting to a letter to his brother Theo, to show him what he had made. Based on this, the painting has been dated October 1884. At the same time there are indications that the painting was reworked two years later, in 1886, with brighter colours. In that year, Van Gogh was in Paris and, under the influence of the impressionists, he started working with lighter colours. It is not easy to determine which strokes of paint were made in the Netherlands and which were added in France. The blue stripes which stand out against the sky and the light touches in the trees seem to have been added in France. These are brighter than the colours he used in his Dutch period. The way in which the ground is painted, built up of isolated strokes of paint, also seems to acknowledge an impressionistic influence. Van Gogh left the signature at bottom left, which already appeared on the painting, when he did the repainting. The Dutch paint can still be seen there. Source: Annet Tellegen, 'De populierenlaan bij Nuenen van Vincent van Gogh', Bulletin Museum Boymans-van Beuningen, Rotterdam 1967, pp. 8-15. X-ray photos have shown that Van Gogh had initially used this canvas for a completely different painting. The contours of a church tower and a landscape can be seen. Perhaps he was dissatisfied with this composition and therefore used the same canvas for a different painting. Or could he not afford a new canvas and sacrificed an old work in order to be able to create a new one?
|Title||Poplars near Nuenen|
|Material and technique||Oil on canvas|
|Location||This object is on view in room 13|
Height : 78 cm
Width : 98 cm
Painter: Vincent van Gogh
|Accession number||1239 (MK)|
|Credits||Schenking / Donation: 26 Rotterdamse kunstvrienden / 26 Rotterdam friends of the arts 1903|
|Age maker||About 32 years old|
|Exhibitions|| Impressionisme: Een schone kijk (1992)
The Collection Enriched (2011)
De collectie als tijdmachine (2017)
|External exhibitions|| Van Gogh aan het werk (2013)
|Material||Oil > Paint > Artist's material > Material > Material and technique|
|Canvas > Worked fibres > Fibre > Vegetable material > Organic material > Material > Material and technique|
|Object||Painting > Painting > Two-dimensional object > Art object|
|Geographical origin||The Netherlands > Western Europe > Europe|
|Place of manufacture||Nuenen > North Brabant > The Netherlands > Western Europe > Europe|
All about the maker
Vincent van Gogh
Zundert 1853 - Auvers-sur-Oise 1890
Vincent van Gogh was the son of a minister and a preacher himself for a while. After he was dismissed in 1880 from his position as preacher in the poor mine reg..